Afghanistan vs Brazil: Rice: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) … square

Afghanistan
0.358 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Brazil
0.4813 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Afghanistan rank
51st
Brazil rank
48th

Rice: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) … square over time

  • Afghanistan
  • Brazil
0.10.20.30.40.50.6196119922023

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 0.4813 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.358 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Afghanistan, a difference of 0.1233 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Brazil's figure about 1.3 times Afghanistan's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Brazil has been ahead every year.

Afghanistan ranks 51st and Brazil ranks 48th of 102 countries.

Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Afghanistan Brazil Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2171 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2925 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0753 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Brazil
1970s 0.2462 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3568 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1106 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Brazil
1980s 0.2094 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4548 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2453 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Brazil
1990s 0.2081 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4455 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2375 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Brazil
2000s 0.2771 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5421 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2651 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Brazil
2010s 0.3812 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5511 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1699 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Brazil
2020s 0.3698 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5125 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1427 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per, Afghanistan or Brazil?
Brazil, at 0.4813 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.358 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Afghanistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in rice — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per between Afghanistan and Brazil?
0.1233 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Brazil?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Afghanistan and Brazil rank globally for rice — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per?
Afghanistan ranks 51st and Brazil ranks 48th of 102 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Rice — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Afghanistan vs Brazil: Rice — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/rice-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/afghanistan/brazil/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/rice-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/afghanistan/brazil/">Afghanistan vs Brazil: Rice — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
103 places, 5,836 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Rice — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.