Australia and New Zealand vs Yugoslav SFR: Rice: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) … annual

Australia and New Zealand
24.68 % change on previous year
in 2024
Yugoslav SFR
35.94 % change on previous year
in 1991
Australia and New Zealand rank
7th
Yugoslav SFR rank
4th

Rice: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) … annual over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Yugoslav SFR
0200400600800196219932024

How they compare

Yugoslav SFR currently reports 35.94 % change on previous year against 24.68 % change on previous year in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 11.26 % change on previous year.

That makes Yugoslav SFR's figure about 1.5 times Australia and New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 18 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Yugoslav SFR ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 7th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 4th of 130 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 3 and Yugoslav SFR in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Yugoslav SFR Difference Ahead
1960s 10.98 % change on previous year 6.29 % change on previous year 4.68 % change on previous year Australia and New Zealand
1970s 11.66 % change on previous year 4.82 % change on previous year 6.84 % change on previous year Australia and New Zealand
1980s 4.8 % change on previous year -0.7795 % change on previous year 5.58 % change on previous year Australia and New Zealand
1990s -0.0221 % change on previous year 18.17 % change on previous year 18.19 % change on previous year Yugoslav SFR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Australia and New Zealand or Yugoslav SFR?
Yugoslav SFR, at 35.94 % change on previous year against 24.68 % change on previous year in Australia and New Zealand as of 1991.
What is the difference in rice — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Australia and New Zealand and Yugoslav SFR?
11.26 % change on previous year, with Yugoslav SFR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Yugoslav SFR?
30 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 1991.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Yugoslav SFR rank globally for rice — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 7th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 4th of 130 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Rice — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Yugoslav SFR: Rice — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/rice-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-annual-growth-rate/australia-and-new-zealand/yugoslav-sfr/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/rice-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-annual-growth-rate/australia-and-new-zealand/yugoslav-sfr/">Australia and New Zealand vs Yugoslav SFR: Rice — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
159 places, 8,982 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Rice — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.