Cuba vs Sudan: Rice — Area harvested, annual growth rate
Cuba
36.46 % change on previous year
in 2024
Sudan
26.98 % change on previous year
in 2024
Cuba rank
5th
Sudan rank
7th
Rice — Area harvested, annual growth rate over time
- Cuba
- Sudan
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 36.46 % change on previous year against 26.98 % change on previous year in Sudan, a difference of 9.48 % change on previous year.
That makes Cuba's figure about 1.4 times Sudan's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Sudan ahead.
Cuba ranks 5th and Sudan ranks 7th of 130 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -5.52 % change on previous year | 16.04 % change on previous year | 21.56 % change on previous year | Sudan |
| 2020s | -14.89 % change on previous year | -9.21 % change on previous year | 5.68 % change on previous year | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher rice — area harvested, annual growth rate, Cuba or Sudan?
- Cuba, at 36.46 % change on previous year against 26.98 % change on previous year in Sudan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in rice — area harvested, annual growth rate between Cuba and Sudan?
- 9.48 % change on previous year, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2024.
- How do Cuba and Sudan rank globally for rice — area harvested, annual growth rate?
- Cuba ranks 5th and Sudan ranks 7th of 130 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Rice — Area harvested, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Rice — Area harvested. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.