United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland vs United States: Rice and products — Other uses

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
242 1000 t
in 2023
United States
342 1000 t
in 2023
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland rank
8th
United States rank
7th

Rice and products — Other uses over time

  • United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
  • United States
200400600800201020162023

How they compare

United States currently reports 342 1000 t against 242 1000 t in United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, a difference of 100 1000 t.

That makes United States's figure about 1.4 times United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ahead.

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 8th and United States ranks 7th of 154 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland averaged higher in 1 and United States in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland United States Difference Ahead
2010s 356.8 1000 t 234.6 1000 t 122.2 1000 t United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
2020s 329.5 1000 t 449 1000 t 119.5 1000 t United States

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice and products — other uses, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland or United States?
United States, at 342 1000 t against 242 1000 t in United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland as of 2023.
What is the difference in rice and products — other uses between United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and United States?
100 1000 t, with United States ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and United States?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and United States rank globally for rice and products — other uses?
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 8th and United States ranks 7th of 154 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Rice and products — Other uses (non-food). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland vs United States: Rice and products — Other uses. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/rice-and-products-other-uses-non-food/united-kingdom-of-great-britain-and-northern-ireland/united-states/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/rice-and-products-other-uses-non-food/united-kingdom-of-great-britain-and-northern-ireland/united-states/">United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland vs United States: Rice and products — Other uses</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice and products — Other uses (non-food)
Unit
1000 t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
184 places, 2,285 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.