Uganda vs United Arab Emirates: Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals
Uganda
0 t
in 2017
United Arab Emirates
0 t
in 2023
Uganda rank
8th
United Arab Emirates rank
8th
Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals over time
- Uganda
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
Uganda currently reports 0 t against 0 t in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 0 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2010 it was United Arab Emirates ahead.
Uganda ranks 8th and United Arab Emirates ranks 8th of 101 countries.
Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher raw silk (not thrown) — residuals, Uganda or United Arab Emirates?
- Uganda, at 0 t against 0 t in United Arab Emirates as of 2017.
- What is the difference in raw silk (not thrown) — residuals between Uganda and United Arab Emirates?
- 0 t, with Uganda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Uganda and United Arab Emirates?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2017.
- How do Uganda and United Arab Emirates rank globally for raw silk (not thrown) — residuals?
- Uganda ranks 8th and United Arab Emirates ranks 8th of 101 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.