Southern Africa vs Uzbekistan: Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals
Southern Africa
1 t
in 2023
Uzbekistan
0 t
in 2023
Southern Africa rank
5th
Uzbekistan rank
8th
Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals over time
- Southern Africa
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Southern Africa currently reports 1 t against 0 t in Uzbekistan, a difference of 1 t.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Uzbekistan ahead.
Southern Africa ranks 5th and Uzbekistan ranks 8th of 27 groups.
Southern Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Southern Africa | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -0.7 t | -224.2 t | 223.5 t | Southern Africa |
| 2020s | 0.25 t | 0 t | 0.25 t | Southern Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher raw silk (not thrown) — residuals, Southern Africa or Uzbekistan?
- Southern Africa, at 1 t against 0 t in Uzbekistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in raw silk (not thrown) — residuals between Southern Africa and Uzbekistan?
- 1 t, with Southern Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Southern Africa and Uzbekistan?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Southern Africa and Uzbekistan rank globally for raw silk (not thrown) — residuals?
- Southern Africa ranks 5th and Uzbekistan ranks 8th of 27 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.