Southern Africa vs Uganda: Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals
Southern Africa
1 t
in 2023
Uganda
0 t
in 2017
Southern Africa rank
5th
Uganda rank
8th
Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals over time
- Southern Africa
- Uganda
How they compare
Southern Africa currently reports 1 t against 0 t in Uganda, a difference of 1 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Uganda ahead.
Southern Africa ranks 5th and Uganda ranks 8th of 27 groups.
Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher raw silk (not thrown) — residuals, Southern Africa or Uganda?
- Southern Africa, at 1 t against 0 t in Uganda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in raw silk (not thrown) — residuals between Southern Africa and Uganda?
- 1 t, with Southern Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Southern Africa and Uganda?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2017.
- How do Southern Africa and Uganda rank globally for raw silk (not thrown) — residuals?
- Southern Africa ranks 5th and Uganda ranks 8th of 27 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.