What is the difference in raw silk (not thrown) — residuals between Small island developing States (SIDS) and Sweden?

0 t, with Small island developing States (SIDS) ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Small island developing States (SIDS) and Sweden?

13 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Small island developing States (SIDS) vs Sweden: Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals

Small island developing States (SIDS)

0 t

in 2023

Sweden

0 t

in 2023

Small island developing States (SIDS) rank

2nd

Sweden rank

8th

Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals over time

Small island developing States (SIDS)
Sweden

How they compare

Small island developing States (SIDS) currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Sweden, a difference of 0 t.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Sweden ahead.

Small island developing States (SIDS) ranks 2nd and Sweden ranks 8th of 13 regions.

Small island developing States (SIDS) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Small island developing States (SIDS)	Sweden	Difference	Ahead
2010s	0.1111 t	0 t	0.1111 t	Small island developing States (SIDS)
2020s	0.5 t	0 t	0.5 t	Small island developing States (SIDS)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw silk (not thrown) — residuals, Small island developing States (SIDS) or Sweden?: Small island developing States (SIDS), at 0 t against 0 t in Sweden as of 2023.
What is the difference in raw silk (not thrown) — residuals between Small island developing States (SIDS) and Sweden?: 0 t, with Small island developing States (SIDS) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Small island developing States (SIDS) and Sweden?: 13 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Small island developing States (SIDS) and Sweden rank globally for raw silk (not thrown) — residuals?: Small island developing States (SIDS) ranks 2nd and Sweden ranks 8th of 13 regions.
Where does this data come from?: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Small island developing States (SIDS) vs Sweden: Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-silk-not-thrown-residuals/small-island-developing-states-sids/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-silk-not-thrown-residuals/small-island-developing-states-sids/sweden/">Small island developing States (SIDS) vs Sweden: Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals
Unit: t
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage: 141 places, 1,573 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed: 12 August 2026

Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.