Polynesia vs Sweden: Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals
Polynesia
0 t
in 2023
Sweden
0 t
in 2023
Polynesia rank
8th
Sweden rank
8th
Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals over time
- Polynesia
- Sweden
How they compare
Polynesia currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Sweden, a difference of 0 t.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.
Polynesia ranks 8th and Sweden ranks 8th of 110 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Polynesia | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
| 2020s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher raw silk (not thrown) — residuals, Polynesia or Sweden?
- Polynesia, at 0 t against 0 t in Sweden as of 2023.
- What is the difference in raw silk (not thrown) — residuals between Polynesia and Sweden?
- 0 t, with Polynesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Polynesia and Sweden?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2023.
- How do Polynesia and Sweden rank globally for raw silk (not thrown) — residuals?
- Polynesia ranks 8th and Sweden ranks 8th of 110 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.