Oceania vs Uzbekistan: Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals
Oceania
0 t
in 2023
Uzbekistan
0 t
in 2023
Oceania rank
7th
Uzbekistan rank
8th
Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals over time
- Oceania
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Oceania currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0 t.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Uzbekistan ahead.
Oceania ranks 7th and Uzbekistan ranks 8th of 27 groups.
Across the 2 decades both report, Oceania averaged higher in 1 and Uzbekistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Oceania | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -0.6 t | -224.2 t | 223.6 t | Oceania |
| 2020s | -5.5 t | 0 t | 5.5 t | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher raw silk (not thrown) — residuals, Oceania or Uzbekistan?
- Oceania, at 0 t against 0 t in Uzbekistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in raw silk (not thrown) — residuals between Oceania and Uzbekistan?
- 0 t, with Oceania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Oceania and Uzbekistan?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Oceania and Uzbekistan rank globally for raw silk (not thrown) — residuals?
- Oceania ranks 7th and Uzbekistan ranks 8th of 27 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.