Oceania vs Peru: Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals
Oceania
0 t
in 2023
Peru
0 t
in 2023
Oceania rank
7th
Peru rank
8th
Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals over time
- Oceania
- Peru
How they compare
Oceania currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Peru, a difference of 0 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Peru ahead.
Oceania ranks 7th and Peru ranks 8th of 30 regions.
Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Oceania | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -0.6 t | 0 t | 0.6 t | Peru |
| 2020s | -5.5 t | 0 t | 5.5 t | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher raw silk (not thrown) — residuals, Oceania or Peru?
- Oceania, at 0 t against 0 t in Peru as of 2023.
- What is the difference in raw silk (not thrown) — residuals between Oceania and Peru?
- 0 t, with Oceania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Oceania and Peru?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Oceania and Peru rank globally for raw silk (not thrown) — residuals?
- Oceania ranks 7th and Peru ranks 8th of 30 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.