Namibia vs Zimbabwe: Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals

Namibia
0 t
in 2021
Zimbabwe
0 t
in 2015
Namibia rank
8th
Zimbabwe rank
8th

Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals over time

  • Namibia
  • Zimbabwe
00.20.40.60.81201020152021

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0 t.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.

Namibia ranks 8th and Zimbabwe ranks 8th of 110 countries.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw silk (not thrown) — residuals, Namibia or Zimbabwe?
Namibia, at 0 t against 0 t in Zimbabwe as of 2021.
What is the difference in raw silk (not thrown) — residuals between Namibia and Zimbabwe?
0 t, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Zimbabwe?
5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2015.
How do Namibia and Zimbabwe rank globally for raw silk (not thrown) — residuals?
Namibia ranks 8th and Zimbabwe ranks 8th of 110 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
141 places, 1,573 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.