Namibia vs Tunisia: Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals

Namibia
0 t
in 2021
Tunisia
0 t
in 2023
Namibia rank
8th
Tunisia rank
8th

Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals over time

  • Namibia
  • Tunisia
-6-4-20201020162023

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Tunisia, a difference of 0 t.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Tunisia ahead.

Namibia ranks 8th and Tunisia ranks 8th of 110 countries.

Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Namibia Tunisia Difference Ahead
2010s 0 t -0.75 t 0.75 t Namibia
2020s 0 t 0 t 0 t

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw silk (not thrown) — residuals, Namibia or Tunisia?
Namibia, at 0 t against 0 t in Tunisia as of 2021.
What is the difference in raw silk (not thrown) — residuals between Namibia and Tunisia?
0 t, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Tunisia?
10 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2021.
How do Namibia and Tunisia rank globally for raw silk (not thrown) — residuals?
Namibia ranks 8th and Tunisia ranks 8th of 110 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
141 places, 1,573 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.