Namibia vs Oceania: Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals
Namibia
0 t
in 2021
Oceania
0 t
in 2023
Namibia rank
8th
Oceania rank
8th
Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals over time
- Namibia
- Oceania
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Oceania, a difference of 0 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Oceania ahead.
Namibia ranks 8th and Oceania ranks 8th of 110 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Namibia averaged higher in 1 and Oceania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | Oceania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 t | -0.75 t | 0.75 t | Namibia |
| 2020s | 0 t | 1 t | 1 t | Oceania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher raw silk (not thrown) — residuals, Namibia or Oceania?
- Namibia, at 0 t against 0 t in Oceania as of 2021.
- What is the difference in raw silk (not thrown) — residuals between Namibia and Oceania?
- 0 t, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Oceania?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2021.
- How do Namibia and Oceania rank globally for raw silk (not thrown) — residuals?
- Namibia ranks 8th and Oceania ranks 8th of 110 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.