Malta vs Southern Africa: Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals
Malta
0 t
in 2023
Southern Africa
1 t
in 2023
Malta rank
8th
Southern Africa rank
5th
Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals over time
- Malta
- Southern Africa
How they compare
Southern Africa currently reports 1 t against 0 t in Malta, a difference of 1 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Southern Africa ahead.
Malta ranks 8th and Southern Africa ranks 5th of 101 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Malta averaged higher in 1 and Southern Africa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | Southern Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.4 t | -1 t | 1.4 t | Malta |
| 2020s | 0 t | 0.3333 t | 0.3333 t | Southern Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher raw silk (not thrown) — residuals, Malta or Southern Africa?
- Southern Africa, at 1 t against 0 t in Malta as of 2023.
- What is the difference in raw silk (not thrown) — residuals between Malta and Southern Africa?
- 1 t, with Southern Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Southern Africa?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Malta and Southern Africa rank globally for raw silk (not thrown) — residuals?
- Malta ranks 8th and Southern Africa ranks 5th of 101 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.