Luxembourg vs Namibia: Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals

Luxembourg
0 t
in 2018
Namibia
0 t
in 2021
Luxembourg rank
8th
Namibia rank
8th

Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals over time

  • Luxembourg
  • Namibia
00.20.40.60.81201020152021

How they compare

Luxembourg currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Namibia, a difference of 0 t.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.

Luxembourg ranks 8th and Namibia ranks 8th of 110 countries.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw silk (not thrown) — residuals, Luxembourg or Namibia?
Luxembourg, at 0 t against 0 t in Namibia as of 2018.
What is the difference in raw silk (not thrown) — residuals between Luxembourg and Namibia?
0 t, with Luxembourg ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Namibia?
5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2018.
How do Luxembourg and Namibia rank globally for raw silk (not thrown) — residuals?
Luxembourg ranks 8th and Namibia ranks 8th of 110 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
141 places, 1,573 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.