Least Developed Countries (LDCs) vs Mongolia: Raw silk (not thrown) β Residuals
Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
96 t
in 2023
Mongolia
1 t
in 2019
Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank
2nd
Mongolia rank
4th
Raw silk (not thrown) β Residuals over time
- Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
- Mongolia
How they compare
Least Developed Countries (LDCs) currently reports 96 t against 1 t in Mongolia, a difference of 95 t.
That makes Least Developed Countries (LDCs)'s figure about 96.0 times Mongolia's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Mongolia has been ahead every year.
Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 2nd and Mongolia ranks 4th of 30 regions.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher raw silk (not thrown) β residuals, Least Developed Countries (LDCs) or Mongolia?
- Least Developed Countries (LDCs), at 96 t against 1 t in Mongolia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in raw silk (not thrown) β residuals between Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and Mongolia?
- 95 t, with Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and Mongolia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2019.
- How do Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and Mongolia rank globally for raw silk (not thrown) β residuals?
- Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 2nd and Mongolia ranks 4th of 30 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Raw silk (not thrown) β Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.