What is the difference in raw silk (not thrown) — residuals between Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and Lithuania?

95 t, with Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and Lithuania?

14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) vs Lithuania: Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals

Least Developed Countries (LDCs)

96 t

in 2023

Lithuania

1 t

in 2023

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank

2nd

Lithuania rank

4th

Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals over time

Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
Lithuania

How they compare

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) currently reports 96 t against 1 t in Lithuania, a difference of 95 t.

That makes Least Developed Countries (LDCs)'s figure about 96.0 times Lithuania's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Lithuania ahead.

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 2nd and Lithuania ranks 4th of 30 regions.

Across the 2 decades both report, Least Developed Countries (LDCs) averaged higher in 1 and Lithuania in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Least Developed Countries (LDCs)	Lithuania	Difference	Ahead
2010s	-0.5 t	0 t	0.5 t	Lithuania
2020s	22.5 t	0.25 t	22.25 t	Least Developed Countries (LDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw silk (not thrown) — residuals, Least Developed Countries (LDCs) or Lithuania?: Least Developed Countries (LDCs), at 96 t against 1 t in Lithuania as of 2023.
What is the difference in raw silk (not thrown) — residuals between Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and Lithuania?: 95 t, with Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and Lithuania?: 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and Lithuania rank globally for raw silk (not thrown) — residuals?: Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 2nd and Lithuania ranks 4th of 30 regions.
Where does this data come from?: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) vs Lithuania: Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-silk-not-thrown-residuals/least-developed-countries-ldcs/lithuania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-silk-not-thrown-residuals/least-developed-countries-ldcs/lithuania/">Least Developed Countries (LDCs) vs Lithuania: Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals
Unit: t
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage: 141 places, 1,573 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed: 12 August 2026

Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.