Indonesia vs Namibia: Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals

Indonesia
0 t
in 2023
Namibia
0 t
in 2021
Indonesia rank
8th
Namibia rank
8th

Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals over time

  • Indonesia
  • Namibia
00.20.40.60.81201020162023

How they compare

Indonesia currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Namibia, a difference of 0 t.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.

Indonesia ranks 8th and Namibia ranks 8th of 110 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Indonesia Namibia Difference Ahead
2010s 0 t 0 t 0 t
2020s 0 t 0 t 0 t

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw silk (not thrown) — residuals, Indonesia or Namibia?
Indonesia, at 0 t against 0 t in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in raw silk (not thrown) — residuals between Indonesia and Namibia?
0 t, with Indonesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Namibia?
10 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2021.
How do Indonesia and Namibia rank globally for raw silk (not thrown) — residuals?
Indonesia ranks 8th and Namibia ranks 8th of 110 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
141 places, 1,573 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.