Hungary vs Namibia: Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals

Hungary
0 t
in 2021
Namibia
0 t
in 2021
Hungary rank
8th
Namibia rank
8th

Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals over time

  • Hungary
  • Namibia
-150-100-500201020152021

How they compare

Hungary currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Namibia, a difference of 0 t.

Across all 9 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.

Hungary ranks 8th and Namibia ranks 8th of 110 countries.

Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hungary Namibia Difference Ahead
2010s -32.75 t 0 t 32.75 t Namibia
2020s 0 t 0 t 0 t

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw silk (not thrown) — residuals, Hungary or Namibia?
Hungary, at 0 t against 0 t in Namibia as of 2021.
What is the difference in raw silk (not thrown) — residuals between Hungary and Namibia?
0 t, with Hungary ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Namibia?
9 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2021.
How do Hungary and Namibia rank globally for raw silk (not thrown) — residuals?
Hungary ranks 8th and Namibia ranks 8th of 110 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
141 places, 1,573 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.