Eswatini vs Southern Africa: Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals
Eswatini
2 t
in 2023
Southern Africa
1 t
in 2023
Eswatini rank
2nd
Southern Africa rank
5th
Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals over time
- Eswatini
- Southern Africa
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 2 t against 1 t in Southern Africa, a difference of 1 t.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 2.0 times Southern Africa's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Southern Africa ahead.
Eswatini ranks 2nd and Southern Africa ranks 5th of 101 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Southern Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 t | -0.875 t | 0.875 t | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 1 t | 0.5 t | 0.5 t | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher raw silk (not thrown) — residuals, Eswatini or Southern Africa?
- Eswatini, at 2 t against 1 t in Southern Africa as of 2023.
- What is the difference in raw silk (not thrown) — residuals between Eswatini and Southern Africa?
- 1 t, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Southern Africa?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Eswatini and Southern Africa rank globally for raw silk (not thrown) — residuals?
- Eswatini ranks 2nd and Southern Africa ranks 5th of 101 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.