Which has higher raw silk (not thrown) — residuals, Eswatini or Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?

Least Developed Countries (LDCs), at 96 t against 2 t in Eswatini as of 2023.

What is the difference in raw silk (not thrown) — residuals between Eswatini and Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?

94 t, with Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?

10 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Eswatini vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals

Eswatini

2 t

in 2023

Least Developed Countries (LDCs)

96 t

in 2023

Eswatini rank

2nd

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank

1st

Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals over time

Eswatini
Least Developed Countries (LDCs)

How they compare

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) currently reports 96 t against 2 t in Eswatini, a difference of 94 t.

That makes Least Developed Countries (LDCs)'s figure about 48.0 times Eswatini's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 2nd and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 1st of 101 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 1 and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Eswatini	Least Developed Countries (LDCs)	Difference	Ahead
2010s	0 t	-0.375 t	0.375 t	Eswatini
2020s	1 t	47 t	46 t	Least Developed Countries (LDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw silk (not thrown) — residuals, Eswatini or Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?: Least Developed Countries (LDCs), at 96 t against 2 t in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in raw silk (not thrown) — residuals between Eswatini and Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?: 94 t, with Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?: 10 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank globally for raw silk (not thrown) — residuals?: Eswatini ranks 2nd and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 1st of 101 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-silk-not-thrown-residuals/eswatini/least-developed-countries-ldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-silk-not-thrown-residuals/eswatini/least-developed-countries-ldcs/">Eswatini vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals
Unit: t
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage: 141 places, 1,573 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed: 12 August 2026

Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.