Congo vs Southern Africa: Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals
Congo
1 t
in 2021
Southern Africa
1 t
in 2023
Congo rank
4th
Southern Africa rank
5th
Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals over time
- Congo
- Southern Africa
How they compare
Congo currently reports 1 t against 1 t in Southern Africa, a difference of 0 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Southern Africa ahead.
Congo ranks 4th and Southern Africa ranks 5th of 101 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Southern Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 t | -1.25 t | 1.25 t | Congo |
| 2020s | 1 t | 0 t | 1 t | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher raw silk (not thrown) — residuals, Congo or Southern Africa?
- Congo, at 1 t against 1 t in Southern Africa as of 2021.
- What is the difference in raw silk (not thrown) — residuals between Congo and Southern Africa?
- 0 t, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Southern Africa?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2021.
- How do Congo and Southern Africa rank globally for raw silk (not thrown) — residuals?
- Congo ranks 4th and Southern Africa ranks 5th of 101 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.