Congo vs Lithuania: Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals

Congo
1 t
in 2021
Lithuania
1 t
in 2023
Congo rank
4th
Lithuania rank
4th

Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals over time

  • Congo
  • Lithuania
00.20.40.60.81201020162023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 1 t against 1 t in Lithuania, a difference of 0 t.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Lithuania ahead.

Congo ranks 4th and Lithuania ranks 4th of 110 countries.

Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Lithuania Difference Ahead
2010s 0 t 0 t 0 t
2020s 1 t 0 t 1 t Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw silk (not thrown) — residuals, Congo or Lithuania?
Congo, at 1 t against 1 t in Lithuania as of 2021.
What is the difference in raw silk (not thrown) — residuals between Congo and Lithuania?
0 t, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Lithuania?
5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2021.
How do Congo and Lithuania rank globally for raw silk (not thrown) — residuals?
Congo ranks 4th and Lithuania ranks 4th of 110 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
141 places, 1,573 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.