Which has higher raw silk (not thrown) — residuals, Congo, Republic of or Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?

Least Developed Countries (LDCs), at 96 t against 1 t in Congo, Republic of as of 2023.

What is the difference in raw silk (not thrown) — residuals between Congo, Republic of and Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?

95 t, with Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Congo, Republic of and Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?

5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2021.

Where does this data come from?

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Congo, Republic of vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals

Congo, Republic of

1 t

in 2021

Least Developed Countries (LDCs)

96 t

in 2023

Congo, Republic of rank

4th

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank

2nd

Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals over time

Congo, Republic of
Least Developed Countries (LDCs)

How they compare

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) currently reports 96 t against 1 t in Congo, Republic of, a difference of 95 t.

That makes Least Developed Countries (LDCs)'s figure about 96.0 times Congo, Republic of's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Congo, Republic of ahead.

Congo, Republic of ranks 4th and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 2nd of 101 countries.

Congo, Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Congo, Republic of	Least Developed Countries (LDCs)	Difference	Ahead
2010s	0 t	-0.75 t	0.75 t	Congo, Republic of
2020s	1 t	-2 t	3 t	Congo, Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw silk (not thrown) — residuals, Congo, Republic of or Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?: Least Developed Countries (LDCs), at 96 t against 1 t in Congo, Republic of as of 2023.
What is the difference in raw silk (not thrown) — residuals between Congo, Republic of and Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?: 95 t, with Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo, Republic of and Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?: 5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2021.
How do Congo, Republic of and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank globally for raw silk (not thrown) — residuals?: Congo, Republic of ranks 4th and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 2nd of 101 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo, Republic of vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-silk-not-thrown-residuals/congo-rep/least-developed-countries-ldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-silk-not-thrown-residuals/congo-rep/least-developed-countries-ldcs/">Congo, Republic of vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals
Unit: t
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage: 141 places, 1,573 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed: 12 August 2026

Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.