China vs Namibia: Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals
China
0 t
in 2023
Namibia
0 t
in 2021
China rank
8th
Namibia rank
8th
Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals over time
- China
- Namibia
How they compare
China currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Namibia, a difference of 0 t.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.
China ranks 8th and Namibia ranks 8th of 110 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -0.5 t | 0 t | 0.5 t | Namibia |
| 2020s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher raw silk (not thrown) — residuals, China or Namibia?
- China, at 0 t against 0 t in Namibia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in raw silk (not thrown) — residuals between China and Namibia?
- 0 t, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Namibia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2021.
- How do China and Namibia rank globally for raw silk (not thrown) — residuals?
- China ranks 8th and Namibia ranks 8th of 110 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.