China vs Denmark: Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals
China
0 t
in 2023
Denmark
0 t
in 2023
China rank
8th
Denmark rank
8th
Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals over time
- China
- Denmark
How they compare
China currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Denmark, a difference of 0 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Denmark ahead.
China ranks 8th and Denmark ranks 8th of 110 countries.
Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Denmark | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -0.4 t | -0.1 t | 0.3 t | Denmark |
| 2020s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher raw silk (not thrown) — residuals, China or Denmark?
- China, at 0 t against 0 t in Denmark as of 2023.
- What is the difference in raw silk (not thrown) — residuals between China and Denmark?
- 0 t, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Denmark?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do China and Denmark rank globally for raw silk (not thrown) — residuals?
- China ranks 8th and Denmark ranks 8th of 110 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.