China, mainland vs Namibia: Raw silk (not thrown) β Residuals
China, mainland
0 t
in 2023
Namibia
0 t
in 2021
China, mainland rank
8th
Namibia rank
8th
Raw silk (not thrown) β Residuals over time
- China, mainland
- Namibia
How they compare
China, mainland currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Namibia, a difference of 0 t.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.
China, mainland ranks 8th and Namibia ranks 8th of 101 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China, mainland | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | β |
| 2020s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | β |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher raw silk (not thrown) β residuals, China, mainland or Namibia?
- China, mainland, at 0 t against 0 t in Namibia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in raw silk (not thrown) β residuals between China, mainland and Namibia?
- 0 t, with China, mainland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China, mainland and Namibia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2021.
- How do China, mainland and Namibia rank globally for raw silk (not thrown) β residuals?
- China, mainland ranks 8th and Namibia ranks 8th of 101 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Raw silk (not thrown) β Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.