China, Hong Kong SAR vs Sweden: Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals
China, Hong Kong SAR
0 t
in 2015
Sweden
0 t
in 2023
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
8th
Sweden rank
8th
Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals over time
- China, Hong Kong SAR
- Sweden
How they compare
China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Sweden, a difference of 0 t.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 8th and Sweden ranks 8th of 101 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher raw silk (not thrown) — residuals, China, Hong Kong SAR or Sweden?
- China, Hong Kong SAR, at 0 t against 0 t in Sweden as of 2015.
- What is the difference in raw silk (not thrown) — residuals between China, Hong Kong SAR and Sweden?
- 0 t, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Sweden?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2015.
- How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Sweden rank globally for raw silk (not thrown) — residuals?
- China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 8th and Sweden ranks 8th of 101 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.