China, Hong Kong SAR vs Oceania: Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals
China, Hong Kong SAR
0 t
in 2015
Oceania
0 t
in 2023
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
8th
Oceania rank
7th
Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals over time
- China, Hong Kong SAR
- Oceania
How they compare
China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Oceania, a difference of 0 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Oceania ahead.
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 8th and Oceania ranks 7th of 101 countries.
China, Hong Kong SAR has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher raw silk (not thrown) — residuals, China, Hong Kong SAR or Oceania?
- China, Hong Kong SAR, at 0 t against 0 t in Oceania as of 2015.
- What is the difference in raw silk (not thrown) — residuals between China, Hong Kong SAR and Oceania?
- 0 t, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Oceania?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2015.
- How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Oceania rank globally for raw silk (not thrown) — residuals?
- China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 8th and Oceania ranks 7th of 101 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.