China, Hong Kong SAR vs Netherlands (Kingdom of the): Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals
China, Hong Kong SAR
0 t
in 2015
Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
0 t
in 2023
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
8th
Netherlands (Kingdom of the) rank
8th
Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals over time
- China, Hong Kong SAR
- Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
How they compare
China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Netherlands (Kingdom of the), a difference of 0 t.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Netherlands (Kingdom of the) has been ahead every year.
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 8th and Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ranks 8th of 101 countries.
Netherlands (Kingdom of the) has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher raw silk (not thrown) — residuals, China, Hong Kong SAR or Netherlands (Kingdom of the)?
- China, Hong Kong SAR, at 0 t against 0 t in Netherlands (Kingdom of the) as of 2015.
- What is the difference in raw silk (not thrown) — residuals between China, Hong Kong SAR and Netherlands (Kingdom of the)?
- 0 t, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Netherlands (Kingdom of the)?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2015.
- How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Netherlands (Kingdom of the) rank globally for raw silk (not thrown) — residuals?
- China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 8th and Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ranks 8th of 101 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.