Chile vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals

Chile
-1 t
in 2023
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
-3 t
in 2023
Chile rank
94th
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland rank
96th

Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals over time

  • Chile
  • United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
-125-100-75-50-250201020162023

How they compare

Chile currently reports -1 t against -3 t in United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, a difference of 2 t.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2010 it was United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ahead.

Chile ranks 94th and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 96th of 101 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Difference Ahead
2010s 0 t 0 t 0 t —
2020s -0.25 t -0.75 t 0.5 t Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw silk (not thrown) — residuals, Chile or United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
Chile, at -1 t against -3 t in United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland as of 2023.
What is the difference in raw silk (not thrown) — residuals between Chile and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
2 t, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
9 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Chile and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland rank globally for raw silk (not thrown) — residuals?
Chile ranks 94th and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 96th of 101 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 26 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-silk-not-thrown-residuals/chile/united-kingdom-of-great-britain-and-northern-ireland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-silk-not-thrown-residuals/chile/united-kingdom-of-great-britain-and-northern-ireland/">Chile vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
141 places, 1,573 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.