Chile vs Malaysia: Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals
Chile
-1 t
in 2023
Malaysia
-4 t
in 2023
Chile rank
94th
Malaysia rank
97th
Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals over time
- Chile
- Malaysia
How they compare
Chile currently reports -1 t against -4 t in Malaysia, a difference of 3 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 94th and Malaysia ranks 97th of 101 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 t | -0.2 t | 0.2 t | Chile |
| 2020s | -0.3333 t | -1.33 t | 1 t | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher raw silk (not thrown) — residuals, Chile or Malaysia?
- Chile, at -1 t against -4 t in Malaysia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in raw silk (not thrown) — residuals between Chile and Malaysia?
- 3 t, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Malaysia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Chile and Malaysia rank globally for raw silk (not thrown) — residuals?
- Chile ranks 94th and Malaysia ranks 97th of 101 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.