Central Asia vs Eswatini: Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals
Central Asia
6 t
in 2023
Eswatini
2 t
in 2023
Central Asia rank
4th
Eswatini rank
2nd
Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals over time
- Central Asia
- Eswatini
How they compare
Central Asia currently reports 6 t against 2 t in Eswatini, a difference of 4 t.
That makes Central Asia's figure about 3.0 times Eswatini's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Eswatini ahead.
Central Asia ranks 4th and Eswatini ranks 2nd of 27 groups.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central Asia | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -295.12 t | 0 t | 295.12 t | Eswatini |
| 2020s | -33.5 t | 1 t | 34.5 t | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher raw silk (not thrown) — residuals, Central Asia or Eswatini?
- Central Asia, at 6 t against 2 t in Eswatini as of 2023.
- What is the difference in raw silk (not thrown) — residuals between Central Asia and Eswatini?
- 4 t, with Central Asia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central Asia and Eswatini?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Central Asia and Eswatini rank globally for raw silk (not thrown) — residuals?
- Central Asia ranks 4th and Eswatini ranks 2nd of 27 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.