Caribbean vs Namibia: Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals

Caribbean
0 t
in 2023
Namibia
0 t
in 2021
Caribbean rank
8th
Namibia rank
8th

Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals over time

  • Caribbean
  • Namibia
00.20.40.60.81201020162023

How they compare

Caribbean currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Namibia, a difference of 0 t.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Namibia ahead.

Caribbean ranks 8th and Namibia ranks 8th of 110 countries.

Caribbean has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw silk (not thrown) — residuals, Caribbean or Namibia?
Caribbean, at 0 t against 0 t in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in raw silk (not thrown) — residuals between Caribbean and Namibia?
0 t, with Caribbean ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Caribbean and Namibia?
6 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2016.
How do Caribbean and Namibia rank globally for raw silk (not thrown) — residuals?
Caribbean ranks 8th and Namibia ranks 8th of 110 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
141 places, 1,573 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.