Cambodia vs Sweden: Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals
Cambodia
0 t
in 2023
Sweden
0 t
in 2023
Cambodia rank
8th
Sweden rank
8th
Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals over time
- Cambodia
- Sweden
How they compare
Cambodia currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Sweden, a difference of 0 t.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.
Cambodia ranks 8th and Sweden ranks 8th of 101 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 t | 0.001 t | 0.001 t | Sweden |
| 2020s | -1 t | 0 t | 1 t | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher raw silk (not thrown) — residuals, Cambodia or Sweden?
- Cambodia, at 0 t against 0 t in Sweden as of 2023.
- What is the difference in raw silk (not thrown) — residuals between Cambodia and Sweden?
- 0 t, with Cambodia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Sweden?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Cambodia and Sweden rank globally for raw silk (not thrown) — residuals?
- Cambodia ranks 8th and Sweden ranks 8th of 101 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.