Botswana vs Uganda: Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals
Botswana
0 t
in 2017
Uganda
0 t
in 2017
Botswana rank
8th
Uganda rank
8th
Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals over time
- Botswana
- Uganda
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Uganda, a difference of 0 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Uganda ahead.
Botswana ranks 8th and Uganda ranks 8th of 110 countries.
Botswana has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher raw silk (not thrown) — residuals, Botswana or Uganda?
- Botswana, at 0 t against 0 t in Uganda as of 2017.
- What is the difference in raw silk (not thrown) — residuals between Botswana and Uganda?
- 0 t, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Uganda?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2017.
- How do Botswana and Uganda rank globally for raw silk (not thrown) — residuals?
- Botswana ranks 8th and Uganda ranks 8th of 110 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.