Botswana vs Denmark: Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals

Botswana
0 t
in 2017
Denmark
0 t
in 2023
Botswana rank
8th
Denmark rank
8th

Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals over time

  • Botswana
  • Denmark
-1-0.8-0.6-0.4-0.2-0201020162023

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Denmark, a difference of 0 t.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Denmark ahead.

Botswana ranks 8th and Denmark ranks 8th of 110 countries.

Botswana has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw silk (not thrown) — residuals, Botswana or Denmark?
Botswana, at 0 t against 0 t in Denmark as of 2017.
What is the difference in raw silk (not thrown) — residuals between Botswana and Denmark?
0 t, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Denmark?
8 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2017.
How do Botswana and Denmark rank globally for raw silk (not thrown) — residuals?
Botswana ranks 8th and Denmark ranks 8th of 110 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
141 places, 1,573 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.