Belgium vs Namibia: Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals
Belgium
0 t
in 2023
Namibia
0 t
in 2021
Belgium rank
8th
Namibia rank
8th
Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals over time
- Belgium
- Namibia
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Namibia, a difference of 0 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Namibia ahead.
Belgium ranks 8th and Namibia ranks 8th of 110 countries.
Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
| 2020s | 0.5 t | 0 t | 0.5 t | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher raw silk (not thrown) — residuals, Belgium or Namibia?
- Belgium, at 0 t against 0 t in Namibia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in raw silk (not thrown) — residuals between Belgium and Namibia?
- 0 t, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Namibia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2021.
- How do Belgium and Namibia rank globally for raw silk (not thrown) — residuals?
- Belgium ranks 8th and Namibia ranks 8th of 110 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.