Belarus vs Oceania: Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals
Belarus
0 t
in 2023
Oceania
0 t
in 2023
Belarus rank
8th
Oceania rank
7th
Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals over time
- Belarus
- Oceania
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Oceania, a difference of 0 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Oceania ahead.
Belarus ranks 8th and Oceania ranks 7th of 101 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Oceania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Oceania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 t | -0.75 t | 0.75 t | Belarus |
| 2020s | 0 t | 1 t | 1 t | Oceania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher raw silk (not thrown) — residuals, Belarus or Oceania?
- Belarus, at 0 t against 0 t in Oceania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in raw silk (not thrown) — residuals between Belarus and Oceania?
- 0 t, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Oceania?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Oceania rank globally for raw silk (not thrown) — residuals?
- Belarus ranks 8th and Oceania ranks 7th of 101 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.