Australia vs Russian Federation: Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals
Australia
-24 t
in 2022
Russian Federation
-12 t
in 2023
Australia rank
101st
Russian Federation rank
99th
Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals over time
- Australia
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Russian Federation currently reports -12 t against -24 t in Australia, a difference of 12 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Russian Federation ahead.
Australia ranks 101st and Russian Federation ranks 99th of 101 countries.
Russian Federation has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -0.6667 t | -0.6667 t | 0 t | — |
| 2020s | -12 t | 0 t | 12 t | Russian Federation |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher raw silk (not thrown) — residuals, Australia or Russian Federation?
- Russian Federation, at -12 t against -24 t in Australia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in raw silk (not thrown) — residuals between Australia and Russian Federation?
- 12 t, with Russian Federation ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Russian Federation?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2022.
- How do Australia and Russian Federation rank globally for raw silk (not thrown) — residuals?
- Australia ranks 101st and Russian Federation ranks 99th of 101 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.