Australia vs Germany: Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals
Australia
-24 t
in 2022
Germany
-19 t
in 2023
Australia rank
101st
Germany rank
100th
Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals over time
- Australia
- Germany
How they compare
Germany currently reports -19 t against -24 t in Australia, a difference of 5 t.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Germany has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 101st and Germany ranks 100th of 101 countries.
Germany has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Germany | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -0.6 t | 0 t | 0.6 t | Germany |
| 2020s | -12 t | 0 t | 12 t | Germany |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher raw silk (not thrown) — residuals, Australia or Germany?
- Germany, at -19 t against -24 t in Australia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in raw silk (not thrown) — residuals between Australia and Germany?
- 5 t, with Germany ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Germany?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2022.
- How do Australia and Germany rank globally for raw silk (not thrown) — residuals?
- Australia ranks 101st and Germany ranks 100th of 101 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.