Australia vs Azerbaijan: Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals
Australia
-24 t
in 2022
Azerbaijan
-11 t
in 2023
Australia rank
101st
Azerbaijan rank
98th
Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals over time
- Australia
- Azerbaijan
How they compare
Azerbaijan currently reports -11 t against -24 t in Australia, a difference of 13 t.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 101st and Azerbaijan ranks 98th of 101 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 1 and Azerbaijan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Azerbaijan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -0.8571 t | -5.43 t | 4.57 t | Australia |
| 2020s | -12 t | -11.5 t | 0.5 t | Azerbaijan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher raw silk (not thrown) — residuals, Australia or Azerbaijan?
- Azerbaijan, at -11 t against -24 t in Australia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in raw silk (not thrown) — residuals between Australia and Azerbaijan?
- 13 t, with Azerbaijan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Azerbaijan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2022.
- How do Australia and Azerbaijan rank globally for raw silk (not thrown) — residuals?
- Australia ranks 101st and Azerbaijan ranks 98th of 101 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.