Australia and New Zealand vs Spain: Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals
Australia and New Zealand
0 t
in 2023
Spain
0 t
in 2023
Australia and New Zealand rank
8th
Spain rank
8th
Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals over time
- Australia and New Zealand
- Spain
How they compare
Australia and New Zealand currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Spain, a difference of 0 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Spain ahead.
Australia and New Zealand ranks 8th and Spain ranks 8th of 101 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 1 and Spain in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia and New Zealand | Spain | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -0.6667 t | -0.8889 t | 0.2222 t | Australia and New Zealand |
| 2020s | -8 t | 0 t | 8 t | Spain |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher raw silk (not thrown) — residuals, Australia and New Zealand or Spain?
- Australia and New Zealand, at 0 t against 0 t in Spain as of 2023.
- What is the difference in raw silk (not thrown) — residuals between Australia and New Zealand and Spain?
- 0 t, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Spain?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Australia and New Zealand and Spain rank globally for raw silk (not thrown) — residuals?
- Australia and New Zealand ranks 8th and Spain ranks 8th of 101 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.