Australia and New Zealand vs Southern Asia: Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals
Australia and New Zealand
0 t
in 2023
Southern Asia
0 t
in 2023
Australia and New Zealand rank
8th
Southern Asia rank
7th
Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals over time
- Australia and New Zealand
- Southern Asia
How they compare
Australia and New Zealand currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Southern Asia, a difference of 0 t.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Southern Asia has been ahead every year.
Australia and New Zealand ranks 8th and Southern Asia ranks 7th of 101 countries.
Southern Asia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia and New Zealand | Southern Asia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -0.6 t | 1.8 t | 2.4 t | Southern Asia |
| 2020s | -6 t | 0 t | 6 t | Southern Asia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher raw silk (not thrown) — residuals, Australia and New Zealand or Southern Asia?
- Australia and New Zealand, at 0 t against 0 t in Southern Asia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in raw silk (not thrown) — residuals between Australia and New Zealand and Southern Asia?
- 0 t, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Southern Asia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Australia and New Zealand and Southern Asia rank globally for raw silk (not thrown) — residuals?
- Australia and New Zealand ranks 8th and Southern Asia ranks 7th of 101 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.