Australia and New Zealand vs Oceania: Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals
Australia and New Zealand
0 t
in 2023
Oceania
0 t
in 2023
Australia and New Zealand rank
8th
Oceania rank
7th
Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals over time
- Australia and New Zealand
- Oceania
How they compare
Australia and New Zealand currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Oceania, a difference of 0 t.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Oceania has been ahead every year.
Australia and New Zealand ranks 8th and Oceania ranks 7th of 101 countries.
Oceania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia and New Zealand | Oceania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -0.6 t | -0.6 t | 0 t | — |
| 2020s | -6 t | -5.5 t | 0.5 t | Oceania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher raw silk (not thrown) — residuals, Australia and New Zealand or Oceania?
- Australia and New Zealand, at 0 t against 0 t in Oceania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in raw silk (not thrown) — residuals between Australia and New Zealand and Oceania?
- 0 t, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Oceania?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Australia and New Zealand and Oceania rank globally for raw silk (not thrown) — residuals?
- Australia and New Zealand ranks 8th and Oceania ranks 7th of 101 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.