Australia and New Zealand vs Kuwait: Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals
Australia and New Zealand
0 t
in 2023
Kuwait
0 t
in 2023
Australia and New Zealand rank
8th
Kuwait rank
8th
Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals over time
- Australia and New Zealand
- Kuwait
How they compare
Australia and New Zealand currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Kuwait, a difference of 0 t.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Kuwait has been ahead every year.
Australia and New Zealand ranks 8th and Kuwait ranks 8th of 101 countries.
Kuwait has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia and New Zealand | Kuwait | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -0.8571 t | 0.1429 t | 1 t | Kuwait |
| 2020s | -8 t | 0.3333 t | 8.33 t | Kuwait |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher raw silk (not thrown) — residuals, Australia and New Zealand or Kuwait?
- Australia and New Zealand, at 0 t against 0 t in Kuwait as of 2023.
- What is the difference in raw silk (not thrown) — residuals between Australia and New Zealand and Kuwait?
- 0 t, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Kuwait?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Australia and New Zealand and Kuwait rank globally for raw silk (not thrown) — residuals?
- Australia and New Zealand ranks 8th and Kuwait ranks 8th of 101 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.