Australia and New Zealand vs Austria: Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals
Australia and New Zealand
0 t
in 2023
Austria
0 t
in 2023
Australia and New Zealand rank
8th
Austria rank
8th
Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals over time
- Australia and New Zealand
- Austria
How they compare
Australia and New Zealand currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Austria, a difference of 0 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Austria ahead.
Australia and New Zealand ranks 8th and Austria ranks 8th of 101 countries.
Austria has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia and New Zealand | Austria | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -0.6667 t | -0.1111 t | 0.5556 t | Austria |
| 2020s | -6 t | 0 t | 6 t | Austria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher raw silk (not thrown) — residuals, Australia and New Zealand or Austria?
- Australia and New Zealand, at 0 t against 0 t in Austria as of 2023.
- What is the difference in raw silk (not thrown) — residuals between Australia and New Zealand and Austria?
- 0 t, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Austria?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Australia and New Zealand and Austria rank globally for raw silk (not thrown) — residuals?
- Australia and New Zealand ranks 8th and Austria ranks 8th of 101 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.