Armenia vs Namibia: Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals
Armenia
0 t
in 2015
Namibia
0 t
in 2021
Armenia rank
8th
Namibia rank
8th
Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals over time
- Armenia
- Namibia
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Namibia, a difference of 0 t.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.
Armenia ranks 8th and Namibia ranks 8th of 110 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher raw silk (not thrown) — residuals, Armenia or Namibia?
- Armenia, at 0 t against 0 t in Namibia as of 2015.
- What is the difference in raw silk (not thrown) — residuals between Armenia and Namibia?
- 0 t, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Namibia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2015.
- How do Armenia and Namibia rank globally for raw silk (not thrown) — residuals?
- Armenia ranks 8th and Namibia ranks 8th of 110 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.