Argentina vs Namibia: Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals
Argentina
0 t
in 2020
Namibia
0 t
in 2021
Argentina rank
8th
Namibia rank
8th
Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals over time
- Argentina
- Namibia
How they compare
Argentina currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Namibia, a difference of 0 t.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.
Argentina ranks 8th and Namibia ranks 8th of 110 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
| 2020s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher raw silk (not thrown) — residuals, Argentina or Namibia?
- Argentina, at 0 t against 0 t in Namibia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in raw silk (not thrown) — residuals between Argentina and Namibia?
- 0 t, with Argentina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Namibia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Argentina and Namibia rank globally for raw silk (not thrown) — residuals?
- Argentina ranks 8th and Namibia ranks 8th of 110 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.